
Misfires & Memory
- Savy Hester

- Jun 11
- 4 min read
Misfires & Memory:
Why Sign Language, Visuals, and Predictable Transitions Change Everything for Deaf+ and Autistic Kids
Behavior is never random.
Especially not in Deaf+ and autistic children, where the body becomes both the hard drive and the processor — storing experience in connective tissue and reacting faster than language can catch up.
If we want to reduce meltdowns, shutdowns, and escape behaviors, we need to stop asking:
“How do I fix this behavior?”
And start asking:
“What did the system record the last time this happened?”
Because what looks like defiance or avoidance may actually be an automated reaction from the last time the system coded an experience as dangerous — and no one offered a way to reprogram it.
Let’s break this down with a blend of hard science and real solutions.
⸻
🔹 Connective Tissue Theory: Where Experience Becomes Muscle Memory
Emerging research out of Italy by Ruggiero, Bruna, and Fasano (2019–2023) has begun documenting how the fascia — connective tissue that wraps around every muscle, organ, and nerve — plays a central role in sensory processing, interoception, and somatic memory, especially in autism.
Fascia is highly innervated and acts like a recording interface between the environment and the nervous system.
For autistic individuals, whose systems often run in heightened sensory or threat-detection mode, the fascia retains and reinforces patterns of tension, fear, or distress. This somatic “memory” influences posture, movement anticipation, and reactivity.
➡ One unsafe transition becomes a stored warning.
➡ One unconsented physical prompt becomes a threat map.
➡ One chaotic hallway becomes encoded into the body’s GPS as a place to avoid — permanently, unless rewritten.
And because fascia doesn’t use words, it can’t be reasoned with.
It needs new experiences with different sensory input to rewrite the code.
⸻
🔹 Polyvagal Theory: Why the Body Leads the Brain
Dr. Stephen Porges, in his work on Polyvagal Theory, explains that behavior isn’t just a choice — it’s a reflection of autonomic state.
The vagus nerve (specifically the ventral vagal branch) helps the body shift between:
• Red Zone: fight, flight, freeze
• Yellow Zone: alert, dysregulated
• Green Zone: calm, engaged, learning-ready
But if a child has experienced trauma, unpredictability, or sensory overwhelm, their vagus nerve becomes primed for defense. They’ll drop into “Red” before they can even access communication or cooperation.
For Deaf+ children, this is especially critical — because without visual language, they may never get the chance to feel safe enough to move into the Green Zone at all.
⸻
🔹 Language Deprivation: No Code, No Control
Deaf children without early access to fluent sign language often experience language deprivation — a neurological emergency with lifelong consequences.
Research by Dr. Poorna Kushalnagar, Dr. Wyatte Hall, Dr. Tom Humphries, and others has shown that:
• Language deprivation mimics and compounds trauma
• It leads to executive function deficits, emotional dysregulation, and mental health crises
• Many Deaf+ children are misdiagnosed with behavioral disorders when the root cause is a lack of accessible language scaffolding
You can’t run a program without a compatible operating system.
And when a Deaf+ child doesn’t have access to expressive or receptive communication — they can’t patch the glitch.
Instead, the body panics.
They hit.
They bolt.
They laugh when anxious.
They scream when touched.
They script or repeat or freeze.
Because those are the only executable commands the system has access to.
⸻
🖥 Rebuilding the System: Your Child Is Not Broken — The Code Is
Think of it like this:
You try to run a program — “Time to line up” — but the system has no idea what it means.
It doesn’t know where it’s going.
It doesn’t know what it’s supposed to feel.
There’s no internal clock to measure “soon.”
There’s no language file to describe what they need.
The program misfires.
The system throws errors.
The adult reads this as disobedience.
The child records it as danger.
The fascia tightens.
The vagus nerve shifts into red alert.
And the next time it happens, it happens faster.
That’s how patterns form.
And that’s why interrupting the pattern matters more than correcting the behavior.
⸻
🧩 Action Steps: How to Scaffold Language + Safety Together
1. Use Visuals at Every Transition
• First/Then boards
• Timers
• Gesture cues and icons
• Preview cards before entering new spaces
2. Provide Sign Language Access
• Teach “stop,” “help,” “finished,” “go,” “wait,” “no,” “not yet”
• Use consistent, simple signs throughout the day — not only during behavior episodes
• Model emotional signs like “frustrated,” “confused,” “pain,” “want,” and “don’t want”
3. Offer Predictability & Choice
• Choice boards or “choose one” visuals help build autonomy
• Use social stories or visual narratives to preview upcoming events
• Allow kids to say “not yet” or “I need time” with a gesture or icon
4. Reframe Behavior as Feedback
• If a child runs away, ask: What part of this sequence was unpredictable?
• If a child refuses, ask: Do they have enough language to express “I’m not ready?”
• If a child melts down, ask: Is their system showing a stored pattern from a prior unsafe experience?
⸻
✅ Final Thought
If we don’t offer a way to recategorize experience, the system just keeps repeating what it knows — even if it hurts.
The answer isn’t to punish or “reset” the behavior.
It’s to rebuild the operating system, one trusted interaction at a time.
When we give Deaf+ and autistic children predictable visuals, accessible sign language, and sensory-aware transitions, we do more than help them behave:
🧠 We give their nervous system a reason to trust.
👐 We give their fascia a reason to relax.
🗣 We give their voice a way to speak.
💻 And we finally, finally give their system a code that runs clean.
⸻
Sources & Research:
• Porges, S. (2011). The Polyvagal Theory: Neurophysiological Foundations of Emotions, Attachment, Communication, and Self-regulation.
• Ruggiero, M. et al. (2021). Fascial Network as Sensory Interface in Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Preliminary Report.
• Kushalnagar, P., Hall, W., & Peterson, J. (2019). Language deprivation and socioemotional functioning in Deaf individuals.
• Humphries, T. et al. (2012). Language acquisition for deaf children: Reducing the harms of zero tolerance to the use of alternative approaches.







Comments